Home About Forum Founder Members Registration Online Contact Us Query
 
Dalit 
  Minorities
 
 
Dalit
  Muslims
  Budhism
  International Situation
  Media
  Nepal
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Below the Poverty Line

In both rural and urban areas, the proportion of Muslim households living in pucca houses is lower than the total population. Almost half the Muslim households in India lack access to toilets; this proportion is highest in rural areas. This results in sanitation problem. On the other hand, one in every five Muslim households has flush toilets of its own which is marginally better than that of the Indian population. In urban areas, however, the proportion of Muslim households who have flush toilets is much lower than the proportion for the whole urban population. The use of electricity for lighting is less among Muslim than the all-India average. The disadvantage is quite large in Muslim concentrated villages; the share of villages with no electricity increases substantially as the size of the village falls and the share of Muslim population rises.

Muslims have the lease access to tap water compared to all other socio-religious communities. Muslim households are poorly placed in using fuel for cooking purposes. This disparity is especially wide in urban areas. So the Muslims rank “poorly in water availability, electrification and cooking fuel facilities”. (p.148). The Gopal Singh Committee (1983) also found in its extensive of ghetto areas in several cities dominated by the Muslims, other minorities and the Scheduled Castes. It found that only Muslim areas were deprived of basic amenities which were found available in non-Muslim ghettos. Historically deprived groups have exhibited lower levels of living in economic terms including levels of consumption. The all India Mean Per Capita Expenditure (MPCE) for the year 2004-05 was Rs. 712 with a high of Rs. 1023 for H-General followed by Rs. 646 for H-OBCs, Rs. 635 for Muslims and Rs. 520 for the Scs/STs. Thus relative deprivation of the Muslim community in terms of consumption expenditure is much higher in urban areas than in rural areas. By estimating Head Count Ratio in 2004-05, 61st Round of the NSSO found that SCs/Sts together are the most poor with an HCR of 35% followed by the Muslims who record the second highest incidence of poverty with 31% people below the poverty line. Below are given two data state-wise Urban and rural poverty incidence across socio-religious communities.


State-wise Rural Poverty Indices
States – Urban All
Hindus
Muslims Other Minorities
    All  SCs/STs  OBCs General    
Total
22.7
22.6
34.8
19.5
9.0
26.9
14.3
West Bengal
25
21
27
16
14
33
32
Kerala
9
9
19
7
4
11
4
Uttar Pradesh
28
28
39
26
10
33
40
Bihar
35
34
56
29
13
38
33
Assam
18
12
14
16
7
27
20
Jammu & Kashmir
3
3
4
0
2
4
0
Jharkhand
38
38
49
32
17
36
46
Karnataka
14
14
21
14
7
18
1
Uttaranchal
11
12
17
19
7
8
21
Delhi
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Maharashtra
23
22
44
16
13
21
36
Andhra Pradesh
8
8
16
6
2
7
4
Gujarat
14
15
24
14
3
7
6
Rajasthan
16
16
28
9
6
11
15
Madhya Pradesh
30
31
45
22
6
25
2
Haryana
9
9
21
7
2
24
6
Tamil Nadu
17
17
23
14
14
10
18
Orissa
41
40
60
30
16
22
70
Himachal Pradesh
8
8
16
7
4
4
6
Chhattisgarh
33
33
40
27
26
40
11
Punjab
6
4
4
7
3
4
6
All Other State
12
48
29
12
10
22
3


State-wise Urban Poverty Indices
States – Urban All
Hindus
Muslims Other Minorities
    All  SCs/STs  OBCs General    
Total
22.8
20.4
36.4
25.1
8.3
38.4
12.2
West Bengal
12
10
22
13
6
27
1
Kerala
18
19
32
21
8
24
9
Uttar Pradesh
31
24
42
28
11
44
6
Bihar
36
34
65
39
8
45
4
Assam
3
3
4
5
1
5
0
Jammu & Kashmir
9
4
9
5
2
12
2
Jharkhand
18
10
37
15
50
32
27
Karnataka
30
27
52
30
13
45
9
Uttaranchal
15
14
29
20
80
24
0
Delhi
12
12
24
24
4
22
1
Maharashtra
26
20
33
25
12
49
27
Andhra Pradesh
26
25
41
27
11
35
16
Gujarat
11
10
17
18
3
24
0
Rajasthan
29
27
47
28
11
41
15
Madhya Pradesh
41
38
64
46
13
58
6
Haryana
5
5
16
5
1
6
0
Tamil Nadu
18
18
37
16
5
18
15
Orissa
43
42
69
49
22
48
49
Himachal Pradesh
2
3
3
10
1
1
0
Chhattisgarh
38
38
48
47
13
61
10
Punjab
1
2
3
2
0
0
0
All Other State
5
6
14
6
3
9
1

In chapter seven of the Gopal Singh Committee Report, there is an emphasis on the importance of education, economic and social betterment. It says that poverty breeds its own culture of acceptance and resignation. It notes on page IX, para 19, that in the distribution of surplus lands by the government, no preference for minorities is made. Similar situation exists in the distribution of house-sites and flats, shops and other concessions like licenses for petrol pumps, cooking gas, transport, fair-price shops and so on.
 
Developed by: Aj Infotek