|
Whither Empowerment
Over
the years, Muslims in India have been parts
of serious discussion at several forums for
many reasons. In political terms, they remained
the subject-matter of political parties which
have taken differential stands sometimes contradictory
over them. It was soon after the adoption of
the Indian Constitution in 1950, with particular
emphasis on the provisions of the Fundamental
Rights and others, some political and non-political
forces began to express their communal preferences
in terms of the distribution of national resources
and governmental priorities. Moreover, they
began to reinstate their communal narratives
in defining the constitutional priorities, nationalism,
national integration, national culture, nation
building, concept and purpose of democracy.
Their basic problem in terms of deliberative
and inclusive democracy, is about the possibility
of their solutions within the constitutional
premise, and his concluding remarks.
It
is also important to mention that the country
made a positive political move to multiparty
system resulting in the formation of coalition
governments both at the levels of the Constituent
Units and the Federal Government. However, it
is also important to note that this political
journey, some political forces, which advocated
non-centralization and anti-Congress System,
extended their communal agenda under the carpet
of federalism, coalitions, and India Shining.
As a result of the triumph of the communal forces
in the states and the Union, the Muslim minority
group began to loose confidence in the enforcement
agencies faster than any period of the history
of Independent India. No doubt, coalition became
the order of the day, many social segments were
benefited but certainly the Muslims’ problems
grew in their proportion, which include mainly
exclusion in public life, security, identity
and equity. These issues have been raised by
the Sachhar Committee (November 2006) and earlier
the Gopal Singh Committee (June 1983). Some
of these issues were highlighted by the reports
of the national Committee of Minorities and
other committees set up by the state governments.
In
other words, Indian democracy and consequent
developments benefited many people except the
Muslims irrespective of the regions and the
states. Shining examples have been very few
states which made some reservations for the
Muslims in their states. In fact, the problems
of ‘protection’ (security/law and
order) and ‘participation’ (share
in public life and effective engagements in
decision making process) of the Muslims have
been alarming in those states and constituencies
where they are in large numbers than other communities.
It is known to everyone that democratic space
has widened its surface at many levels to accommodate
needs and demands of many people. On the contrary,
it failed to deliver corresponding results to
the Muslims community from top to bottom. Similarly
the numerical capacity of the enforcement agencies
and other institutions in private and public
sectors increased in the last 58 years but this
expansion didn’t accommodate/engage the
Muslims as the final result.
Similarly,
number of political parties grew in large number
since the Ninth General Elections but the political
engagements of the Muslims, in terms of their
representative capacity in almost all elected
agencies, have remained tragic. We can find
similar trends in many institutions--educational,
technical, professional and others. It is quite
transparent in the extension of civic amenities
to the residential areas of the Muslims irrespective
of the states and regions. It is also true that
many constitutional reforms and executive orders
were made for the backward classes of citizens
but they failed to benefit the Muslims in any
terms. There was an expectation that the enlargement
of the Secular Establishment would negate communal
considerations in order to provide fair opportunities
to the Muslims with corresponding results. Fast
developing economy and technical revolution
in the country have further widened the surface
of inequality, backwardness and deprivation
in the case of the Muslims. Similarly, the expansion
and growth of electronic and print media in
the country failed to build opinion for the
social justice of the Muslims. They have focused
more on Madrasa, Terrorism, Burqa, Jihad and
Talaq. In other words, their concerns on the
exclusion of the Muslims have almost been nil
with few exceptions. |